This is just my last response to Mark, the Support guy that banned me, but also criticism to the community and server.
Mark's last response:
Because you players are getting spoiled. You think you should know other's people business when you don't. If a player get suspended or not is not your business, it is a matter between us and them. And we were clear to you two times about this, but you kept pushing. There is no ban list for a reason. We are not forced to tell you what is our decision, the rules are on the forum and the modus to report a player is on the forum too. If you do your part as reporter the rest will come on its own and you don't need to know the outcome of the decision.
You are banned because you continue the debate when we kindly asked you to stop, you are banned because we are not forced to show you anything, if we do, you must lose something. You are banned because you claimed he was not suspended when he is. Your ban came after a warning hence is fair.
I agree that many players are getting spoiled, but definitely not me. I don't care about other peoples business, it's really irrelevant to me. But if the one guy that broke the rules 2x only got a 1 day ban, can continue playing like nothing ever happened, and it seems like if he did it again he would get an 3 or 7 day ban next time... and only after all THAT comes the permanent ban? Then I need to say something. That's Absurd. But if I try to "argue" with the Support, I get instantly 15 days banned and after that permanent? Where in the world is this fair?
This whole privacy part is ridiculous. Yes, I do need to know the outcome of the decision, I reported him. It's not you who found him breaking the rules, it was me, you should be thankful that we, the reporters are helping you get rid of such people. An easy "Thanks, here is the outcome of the situation"
is all that is needed.
"You are banned because you continue the debate when we kindly asked you to stop"; That is not a reason to ban someone.
"you are banned because we are not forced to show you anything"; I disagree, you are. Again not a reason to ban someone.
"You are banned because you claimed he was not suspended when he is"; Yes, I assumed that's the case, because you couldn't just said what happened after I posted the screenshots and you banned him. Also, not a reason to ban someone.
Basically, Mark, you needed to escalate all of this and that led to my ban.
I got banned because I wanted to know why his ban had such little consequences.
I got banned because I didn't agree that we reporters have no right to know the outcome.
I got banned because I didn't agree with a rule that is on the Behaviour section of the Game rules. The rule is laughable.
That is not a reason to ban someone, because someone having a different opinion.
You have lost a very friendly player. A pity, 'cause I think your community needs more of that kind.